0.04/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.12 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1920 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 240 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 02:08:34 EDT 2025 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jX8I73Y5WR/E---3.1_8612.p 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN. 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1200s (5) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 240s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with pid 8713 completed with status 0 0.19/0.49 # Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN. 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1200s (5) cores 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.49 # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 649s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 121s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_2 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with pid 8719 completed with status 0 0.19/0.49 # Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN. 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1200s (5) cores 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.49 # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total) 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 649s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 121s (1) cores 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.49 0.19/0.49 # Proof found! 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.49 thf(decl_23, type, r: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.49 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: $i > $i). 0.19/0.49 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_1: ($i > $i) > $i). 0.19/0.49 thf(conj, conjecture, (?[X1:$i > $i]:(![X2:$i]:((r @ X2 @ (X1 @ X2))))<=![X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:((r @ X2 @ X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jX8I73Y5WR/E---3.1_8612.p', conj)). 0.19/0.49 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:((r @ X2 @ X3)))=>?[X1:$i > $i]:(![X2:$i]:((r @ X2 @ (X1 @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])])). 0.19/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X8:$i, X10:$i > $i]:(((r @ X8 @ (esk1_1 @ X8))&~(r @ (esk2_1 @ X10) @ (X10 @ (esk2_1 @ X10))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.19/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i]:(~((r @ (esk2_1 @ X1) @ (X1 @ (esk2_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.49 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((r @ X2 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.19/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 3 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 4 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 4 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 1 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 1 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 2 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 2 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 181 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 58 0.19/0.49 0.19/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 0.19/0.49 0.19/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.009 s 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.016 s 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages 0.19/0.49 % E exiting 0.19/0.50 % E exiting 0.19/0.50 EOF